kAmp7E6C =:DE6?:?8 E@ ?62C=J `b_ DA62<6CD C2:= 282:?DE E96 AC@A@D65 p>2K@? 52E2 46?E6C[ 2E 23@FE aib_ (65?6D52J >@C?:?8 E96 (2CC6?E@? %@H? r@F?4:= G@E65 c\b E@ 2AAC@G6 p>2K@?’D DA64:2= FD6 A6C>:E] r@F?4:= >6>36CD w62E96C $FEA9:? W(2C5 `X[ y2J w6C@FI W(2C5 dX[ qC6EE w2>3J W(2C5 bX 2?5 y:> w2CE>2? W(2C5 cX G@E65 E@ 2AAC@G6 E96 $&! H9:=6 >6>36CD !2F= |@@?6J W2E =2C86X[ s2G:5 |4vF:C6 W2E =2C86X 2?5 q:== $6>A=6 W(2C5 aX G@E65 E@ 56?J]k^Am
kAm%96 564:D:@? >2C<65 E96 6?5 @7 2 AF3=:4 AC@46DD E92E 3682? :? yF=J a_aa H:E9 E96 (2CC6?E@? !=2??:?8 r@>>:DD:@?’D 7:CDE AF3=:4 >66E:?8 @? E96 p>2K@? (63 $6CG:46D AC@A@D2= E@ 3F:=5 2 aa_[___ DBF2C6\7@@E 52E2 46?E6C @? q=24<H6== #@25] x? s646>36C[ E96 A=2??:?8 4@>>:DD:@? G@E65 E@ C64@>>6?5 E92E E96 E@H? 4@F?4:= 56?J E96 A=2?]k^Am
kAm%96 4@F?4:= 96=5 EH@ AF3=:4 962C:?8D 2?5 D6G6C2= H@C< D6DD:@?D @? E96 AC@A@D65 52E2 46?E6C – H:E9 :?AFE 7C@> >@C6 E92? a__ DA62<6CD — 367@C6 (65?6D52J’D 62C=J >@C?:?8 G@E6]k^Am
kAm%96 D6DD:@?[ 96=5 2E u2FBF:6C w:89 $49@@=[ 762EFC65 2 A24<65 2F5:E@C:F> 2?5 2 C2F4@FD 4C@H5] $A62<6CD – ?62C=J 2== @7 H9@> G696>6?E=J @AA@D65 E96 52E2 46?E6C – 2=E6C?2E6=J A=62565 H:E9 E96 4@F?4:= 2?5 D4@=565 E96> 7@C :8?@C:?8 E96:C 6?EC62E:6D]k^Am
kAm{@?8\E:>6 (2CC6?E@? =2?5 FD6 H2CC:@C w@A6 !@CE6C[ hg[ 8@E 2 DE2?5:?8 @G2E:@? 27E6C 96C DA6649]k^Am
kAmp4256>J pH2C5\H:??:?8 24E@C #@36CE sFG2==[ 2 u2FBF:6C C6D:56?E[ 2=D@ 6IAC6DD65 9:D G:6HD] p4256>J\2H2C5:?8sFG2==[ H9@ :D ha[ 56D4C:365 (2CC6?E@? 2D “E96 =2DE DE2E:@? DE@A @? E96 H2J E@ 962G6?” 2?5 2D<65 E96 4@F?4:= E@ 56?J E96 $&!] k^Am
kAm$6>A=6[ |@@?6J 2?5 |4vF:C6 6IAC6DD65 6IEC6>6 5:D2AA@:?E>6?E 27E6C E96 7:?2= G@E6[ 2?5 E96 D42EE6C65 C6D:56?ED H9@ C6>2:?65 27E6C E96 >2C2E9@? AF3=:4 962C:?8 3@@65 2?5 D9@FE65 E96:C 2?86C 2E E96 4@F?4:=]k^Am
kAm$6>A=6 D2:5[ “xE H2D :>A@CE2?E 7@C FD E@ F?56CDE2?5 E96 @G6C2== :>A24ED @7 E96 52E2 46?E6C[ 2?5 H6 5@?’E 92G6 E92E[” 255:?8 E92E 96 4@F=5?’E D66 H92E 36?67:ED E96 52E2 46?E6C H@F=5 3C:?8 E@ C6D:56?ED]k^Am
kAm|@@?6J D2:5 96 762C65 E96 4@F?4:= “925 =@DE E96 ECFDE @7 4:E:K6?D[ 2?5 x F?56CDE2?5 H9J…] %96C6 H2D >F49 HC@?8 H:E9 E9:D 2AA=:42E:@?]”k^Am
kAmqFE w2>3J 2?5 w6C@FI =2:5 @FE H9J E96J 76=E 2AAC@G:?8 E96 52E2 46?E6C H2D E96 C:89E 564:D:@?] w2>3J D2:5 E96 :?5FDEC:2=\K@?65 A2C46= AFC492D65 3J p>2K@? 7@C E96 52E2 46?E6C 925 366? 4@?D:56C65 7@C (2=>2CE[ r@DE4@[ %2C86E[ 2 4@==686[ 2 C6D:56?E:2= AC@;64E] “tG6CJE9:?8 92D 366? EC:65 E96C6 2?5 ?@E9:?8 H@C<65[” 96 D2:5[ 6IA=2:?:?8 E92E E96 =@42E:@? :D AC@3=6>2E:4 7@C >2?J FD6D 3642FD6 E96 D:E6’D @?=J 2446DD :D 7C@> q=24<H6== #@25]k^Am
kAmw2>3J =:DE65 E96 AC@Di p 52E2 46?E6C H@F=5 3C:?8 ?@ EC277:4[ ?@ D49@@= D62ED[ 2?5 E2I C6G6?F6 @7 23@FE Sh__[___ 2??F2==J @G6C 7:G6 J62CD]k^Am
kAmkDEC@?8mr@F?4:=>2? 2D<D 7@C 56=2Jk^DEC@?8mk^Am
kAm$6>A=6 E9C62E6?65 E@ 56C2:= 2 G@E6 @? E96 52E2 46?E6C AC@A@D2= 62C=J :? E96 >66E:?8[ H96? 96 DF886DE65 E92E >@C6 E92? b[___ 6>2:=D E92E 925 366? D@F89E 3J r:E:K6?D 7@C u2FBF:6C r@F?EJ 36 >256 2G2:=23=6 7@C 4@F?4:= >6>36CD E@ C625 — :? 25G2?46 @7 2 G@E6 @? E96 52E2 46?E6C] ruur 925 7:=65 2 ':C8:?:2 uC665@> @7 x?7@C>2E:@? =2HDF:E E@ 82:? 2446DD E@ E96 6>2:=D 36EH66? E@H? @77:4:2=D 2?5 p>2K@?[ 3FE 2 ;F586 CF=65 y2?] f E92E E96 E@H? 925 E96 C:89E E@ H:E99@=5 E96 6>2:=D 32D65 @? 6I64FE:G6 AC:G:=686]k^Am
kAm$6>A=6 4=2:>65 E96 4@F?4:= D9@F=5 36 23=6 E@ D66 E96 6>2:=D D@ E96J 4@F=5 92G6 2== E96 :?7@C>2E:@? A@DD:3=6 367@C6 C6?56C:?8 2 564:D:@?[ 3FE w2>3J[ w2CE>2?[ $FEA9:? 2?5 w6C@FI 5:D28C665] %96 >@E:@? 72:=65]k^Am
kAmw2>3J D2:5 27E6C E96 >66E:?8 E92E 96 H@F=5 92G6 366? :? 72G@C @7 C6=62D:?8 2== E96 6>2:=D 2?JH2J[ 3FE E96 ruur 2??@F?465 u63] `b :E H@F=5 2AA62= E96 ;F586’D 564:D:@?] %96 E@H?’D 2EE@C?6J C64@>>6?565 E92E E96 E@H? ?@E D92C6 2?J @7 E96 4@>>F?:42E:@?D F?E:= =:E:82E:@? H2D 4@>A=6E6]k^Am
kAmk6>m#6249 #@3:? t2C= 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@iC62C=o72FBF:6C]4@>QmC62C=o72FBF:6C]4@>k^2mk^6>mk^Am
(9) comments
I guess those 4 council members and mayor for some pretty big Amazon gift cards.
Moderators - I would like an explanation why my previous posts have been deleted. My post follows all the forum rules. What is the/your problem?
Why does my post keep being deleted??? It follows all the forum rules!
was at the Town Council meeting last night from 6:30 to 2:45am. Warrenton residents - your Council failed you and the 4 "yes" voters (plus the Mayor) are giving the appearance that this process was unethical and had obvious conflict of interest. They refused to share the emails of potential evidentiary value with the citizens. They refused to share the emails with the other Council members prior to the vote. They refused to listen to the hundreds of people who demanded this issue be put to a special Town referendum for a popular vote by Town residents! There have been 4 or more public comment sessions during which the vastly overwhelming majority of comments vehemently opposed this Special Use Permit based on factual, aesthetic, legal, health, property values, and procedural reasons. The Council members who voted "yes" for the Data Center completely ignored public opinion. They may as well have spat in our faces. This whole process has been conducted with obvious ethical conflict of interest problems present, a lack of transparency, and obvious confirmation bias by the Council members who are supporting Amazon. There were more signatories on the various petitions opposing this data center approval then there were voters in the town council elections that voted for all of the council members combined! Yet the 4 members (plus Mayor Carter Nevill) who supported Amazon completely ignored the clear will of the town. Shame on Council member Heather Supthin who "participated" in last night's meeting via phone and referred to unnamed "silent majority" people who supposedly support the data center proposal, yet she refused to go on the record to name these supporters, yet all of us who spoke at the meeting to voice our opinion were required to give our name and address for the record. These Council members are hiding what has really transpired and it is my view they don't care about residents health, our property values, or our opinions. They have willfully ignored that government is OF the people, BY the people and FOR the people. I am saddened to see this terrible development for our beloved town of Warrenton. Last night was a wonderful display of civic participation and passion from those opposed to Amazon, and a shameful display of the worst of local town political shady actions by our Town Council. Shame. Shame. Shame. Voters won't forget this.
The facts were very clear: (1) the SUP application was incomplete and not eligible for a vote, just as the Planning Commission had determined; (2) The Staff appraisal was incredibly incomplete and failed to address any of the application's weaknesses; and (3) Trying to enforce gaping holes in Ordinance will just lead to frustration and endless noise infractions. Meanwhile, Amazon sat smugly in the room and gloated while their pawns threw their careers and self-esteem out the window. If people had any doubt it should be very clear that this group (dubbed "the 4Hs") has now exiled themselves permanently from the public's interest and will stop at nothing to destroy what the rest of us consider as invaluable. They are all up for election in 2024, and let's send them packing. "It's not over until we say its over."
Great job, council! Thank you for putting us citizens in our place! I can't wait to see what other proposals you'll approve in the name of making Warrenton unliveable.
There have been many comments and views expressed on this topic by the residents of this county/town, and they have rejected this proposal. There are four members of the council who will not be reelected who have approved this motion. The council's job is to represent the citizens they lead, but they have failed miserably. The residents should file lawsuits against this project and the members of the town council who voted to approve it and hold them accountable. As a result, we will be able to elect officials who are not cowards and do not bow to big corporations, but who lead with their heart and brains and speak and act in the interests of the people. This is not over and perhaps those who voted in favor have lawsuits brought against them for not following the law, which states that we the people of Warrenton/Fauquier are in charge, and you are our representation; at which you have failed miserably and legally.
From day one it appeared the deal was done with Brandie Schaeffer giving Amazon the go ahead with the property purchase. SMH Those emails apparently are the key......
First thought is what's the process for impeachment of the mayor. Second thought is what's the process into investigating the 4 that denied the board members being able to see the emails. Lastly what is the process to have those 4 removed from the council?
I agree. Litigation is the next step. Let's hold this up in the courts and then elect officials who can represent the people, and not the special interests of the big corporations. We need leaders who have heart and intelligence to be the voice and vote of the people.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.